Don’t Get Fired Over A Matter of Definition

You probably already know this, but it is worth bringing it back up, since almost every CMO today has a lifespan approximately the same time as the gestation period of an elephant. I wonder if those that do get the quick heave ho slant towards the academic way of thinking and acting. Consider this:

The American Marketing Association changed their 20 year old definition of “marketing” in 2008:

Older Version:
“Marketing is a process of planning and executing the conception, pricing, promotion and distribution of goods, ideas and services to create an exchanges that satisfy individual and organizational goals.”

Newer Version (2004):
Marketing is an organizational function and a set of processes for creating, communicating and delivering value to customers and for managing customer relationships in ways that benefit the organization and its stakeholders.”

Latest Version (2008):
“Marketing is the activity, set of institutions, and processes for creating, communicating, delivering, and exchanging offerings that have value for customers, clients, partners, and society at large.”

According to Nancy Costopulos, chief marketing officer of the American Marketing Association, “Marketing is no longer a function — it is an educational process.”

For the record, I am encouraged it took about 40 years to actually add the word customer into the definition in 2004.

With respect to the 2008 revision, the context from Ms. Costopulos follow-on quote is revealing. “Marketing is no longer a function” is the kiss of death. Body parts have functions; parents have functions, heck even the IRS has a function; but not marketing. It just kinda floats out there wandering around without purpose or a role. I’ll give her the benefit of the doubt but probably not a smart reference quote as CMOs are under scrutiny every day. By adding “society at large” along with context that marketing is an “educational process” is as close to getting fired based on fluff as I can think of. Lots of academic chit chat, white boarding and altruist on-campus atmosphere probably doesn’t arm CMOs what they need to live another day. I can imagine how the CEO of a company that is trying meet his/her business goals, thinks about this CMO’s chit chat:


“Well boss, things are going swimmingly well….my department is dysfunctional (contrary to the popular belief that all departments are functions) as I try and use shareholder’s money to educate the consumers why blue tinted bottled water is better than clear water. I suspect after about 4 years of our educational process, millions of dollars later, the consumer will “get it” and we will start to see some sales progress. Plus we helped’ society at large’.”

My advice? Stick close the customers and prospects that deliver the money, being the black ink; not the red kind. Or you may get “pinked”.

4 Responses to “Don’t Get Fired Over A Matter of Definition”

  1. Good Afternoon!!! customereconomics.com is one of the best innovative websites of its kind. I enjoy reading it every day. All the best.

  2. I admire the valuable information you offer in your articles.Great post, You make good points in a concise and pertinent fashion, This is a really good read for me, many thanks to the author

  3. payday loans says:

    The author of customereconomics.com has written an excellent article. You have made your point and there is not much to argue about. It is like the following universal truth that you can not argue with: People who eat at hotel restaurants, don’t deserve to visit other countries Thanks for the info.

  4. I enjoy reading the valuable information you offer in your articles.Just thought you’d be interested to know that I have added you to my bookmarks You make 100% valid points in a concise and pertinent fashion, This is a really good read for me, many thanks to the author

Leave a Reply